Riddle me this: Adam Lanza, ‘computer genius,’ left no online footprint – BlackListedNews.com


Riddle me this: Adam Lanza, ‘computer genius,’ left no online footprint

According to numerous media reports and witnesses, alleged Newtown, Connecticut shooter Adam Lanza was a ‘genius’ with computers. And yet, we are told that Lanza apparently left no online footprint. The question must be asked: Was the electronic history of Adam Lanza scrubbed?

Many articles, including witnesses’ accounts, have described Adam Lanza’s advanced skills with computers, a skill-level common with Asperger’s sufferers. Indeed, many computer hackers have Asperger’s syndrone — Adrian Lamo, Ryan Cleary, and Gary McKinnon, for example. And yet, Adam Lanza ‘left no online footprint?’

According to a New York Daily News article (15 Dec 2012), “[Adam] Lanza, who friends and officials said suffered from Asperger’s syndrome or a personality disorder, had a tortured mind. He was socially awkward and at times unstable, but also extraordinarily bright. ‘He was smart,’ the insider said. ‘He was like one of these real brainiac computer kind of kids.'”

A Honolulu Star Advertiser/New York Times (15 Dec 2012) article, ‘Gunman left few hints about his life or motives,’ noted the alleged shooter’s lack of electronic footprints. “In his brief adulthood [Adam] Lanza had left few footprints, electronic or otherwise. He apparently had no Facebook page, unlike his older brother, Ryan… Lanza did belong to a technology club at school that held ‘LAN parties’ — short for local area network — in which students would gather at a member’s home, hook up their computers into a small network and play games, The Associated Press reported.”

Even ‘original’ school shooting suspect Ryan Lanza, Adam’s brother, had his computers and phone records searched by law enforcement. “Ryan Lanza had been cooperative and was not under arrest or in custody, but investigators were still searching his computers and phone records.” This news was reported in an MSN item (15 Dec 2012), ‘Conn. gunman recalled as intelligent but remote.’

The MSN article includes a statement by one of Adam Lanza’s classmates, Joshua Milas. “Adam Lanza attended Newtown High School, and news clippings from recent years show him on the honor roll. Joshua Milas, a classmate who was in the technology club with Lanza, said that he was generally a happy person but that he hadn’t seen him in a few years. ‘We would hang out, and he was a good kid. He was smart,’ said Milas, who graduated in 2009. ‘He was probably one of the smartest kids I know. He was probably a genius.'” The article also notes Adam’s attendance at the LAN parties.

Anyone with enough computer knowledge to attend and participate in LAN parties would likely have an online footprint. Where’s Adam Lanza’s?

[Alleged Shooter Adam Lanza]

Andrew Sholly
Regional Field Support
Prudential Fox & Roach/The Trident Group
Andrew.Sholly@prufoxroach.com “Professionals helping people achieve the dream of homeownership.”


Obama’s Drones Have Killed at Least 176 Children in Pakistan Alone | LaRouche Irish Brig ade


Obama’s Drones Have Killed at Least 176 Children in Pakistan Alone

Obama’s Drones Have Killed at Least 176 Children in Pakistan Alone

16 Dec. (LPAC) Twenty children and six adults were killed this past week in Newtown, Connecticut, by a deranged individual. These children are not the only ones to have been killed.

On Sept. 25, a study was published by Stanford Law School and New York University’s School of Law entitled, “Living under Drones,” which reported that, contrary to Obama and his top counter-terrorism adviser, John Brennan, civilian deaths are not “exceedingly rare” in drone attacks. (See EIR, Oct. 12, 2012)

The Stanford/NYU report offers figures published by The Bureau of Investigative Journalism (TBIJ), an independent organization based at City University in London.

“TBIJ reports that from June 2004 through mid-September 2012, available data indicate that drone strikes killed 2,562- 3,325 people in Pakistan, of whom 474-881 were civilians, including 176 children. TBIJ reports that these strikes also injured an additional 1,228-1,362 individuals,” according to the Stanford/NYU study.

Obama has already authorized 283 strikes in Pakistan, six times more than the number during President George W. Bush’s eight years in office. As a result, the number of estimated deaths from the Obama administration’s drone strikes is more than four times what it was during the Bush administration — somewhere between 1,494 and 2,618.

Every Tuesday, the President of the United States attends a kill meeting in the White House, in which he selects targets and gives approval to drone attacks, which have already killed 176 innocent children and a total of approximately 1,000 civilians in Pakistan alone. Since Obama also authorizes drone attacks in other nations, the number of children and civilians killed by the President is undoubtedly much higher.

Moreover, according to the London-based rights organization, Reprieve, which with the help of a partner organization in Pakistan facilitated access to some of the people interviewed for the Stanford/NYU study, the psychological damage to the surviving family members is extensive.

According to Reprieve’s director, Clive Stafford Smith, “drone strikes go much further than simply killing innocent civilians. An entire region is being terrorized by the constant threat of death from the skies. Their way of life is collapsing: kids are too terrified to go to school, adults are afraid to attend weddings, funerals, business meetings, or anything that involves gathering in groups. Yet there is no end in sight, and nowhere the ordinary men, women and children of North West Pakistan can go to feel safe.”

Like this:
Like Be the first to like this.
December 17, 2012 Leave a reply

Andrew Sholly
Regional Field Support
Prudential Fox & Roach/The Trident Group
Andrew.Sholly@prufoxroach.com “Professionals helping people achieve the dream of homeownership.”


Obama’s Newtown Speech, Or Why Americans Won’t Have Guns To Protect Themselves From Th e Government Of The Coming Antichrist | Start Thinking Right


Obama’s Newtown Speech, Or Why Americans Won’t Have Guns To Protect Themselves From The Government Of The Coming Antichrist

The president who is responsible for the 55 million innocent babies in America butchered by abortion is exploiting the murder of twenty more to justify the goal that liberals have sought for America just as they sought it in Stalin’s Russia, Hitler’s Germany, Mao’s China, Pol Pot’s Cambodia, Kim’s North Korea, Castro’s Cuba, etc. etc.

I heard Obama’s Newtown speech yesterday evening. He made it crystal clear he’s going to exploit the tragedy in Newtown, Connecticut to go after the Constitution, the 2nd Amendment, your guns and your ability to protect yourselves.

Obama basically blathered religious platitudes for the first third of the speech, then offered a transition that went from “we all want to protect our kids” to “but parents can’t do it alone” to “we need a Big Brother state to confiscate all the guns so children will be safe.” Those aren’t quotes, but that was the logic of the speech.

A transcript of the speech will show what I am saying: Obama began by quoting 2 Corinthians 4:16-18. And who can’t see how obviously that passage logically transitions to the statement, ”so we’re coming after you’re guns now.” Which is why Obama said this:

It comes as a shock at a certain point where you realize no matter how much you love these kids, you can’t do it by yourself, that this job of keeping our children safe and teaching them well is something we can only do together, with the help of friends and neighbors, the help of a community and the help of a nation.

And in that way we come to realize that we bear responsibility for every child, because we’re counting on everybody else to help look after ours, that we’re all parents, that they are all our children.

This is our first task, caring for our children. It’s our first job. If we don’t get that right, we don’t get anything right. That’s how, as a society, we will be judged.

And by that measure, can we truly say, as a nation, that we’re meeting our obligations?

Can we honestly say that we’re doing enough to keep our children, all of them, safe from harm?

Can we claim, as a nation, that we’re all together there, letting them know they are loved and teaching them to love in return?

Can we say that we’re truly doing enough to give all the children of this country the chance they deserve to live out their lives in happiness and with purpose?

I’ve been reflecting on this the last few days, and if we’re honest with ourselves, the answer’s no. We’re not doing enough. And we will have to change. Since I’ve been president, this is the fourth time we have come together to comfort a grieving community torn apart by mass shootings, fourth time we’ve hugged survivors, the fourth time we’ve consoled the families of victims.

And in between, there have been an endless series of deadly shootings across the country, almost daily reports of victims, many of them children, in small towns and in big cities all across America, victims whose — much of the time their only fault was being at the wrong place at the wrong time.

We can’t tolerate this anymore. These tragedies must end. And to end them, we must change. […]

In the coming weeks, I’ll use whatever power this office holds to engage my fellow citizens, from law enforcement, to mental health professionals, to parents and educators, in an effort aimed at preventing more tragedies like
this, because what choice do we have? We can’t accept events like this as routine.

You can’t keep your kids safe on your own. You need your families and your neighbors. And that means you need your Obama Big Brother State, too. And the only way you can protect your children is to completely disarm yourselves and trust completely in Obama for your safety. That’s the logic of Obama’s rhetoric.

Obama says America has to change to protect her children.

This is the thing: any fool can quote the Bible. Obama and Satan both have this in common. So let me quote it to so I can describe the real problem that is plaguing America. And no, it isn’t our guns or our 2nd Amendment:

“But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God–having a form of godliness but denying its power. Have nothing to do with them.” — 2 Timothy 3:1-5

That’s the reason we are suffering a plague of evil. It isn’t guns; we’ve always had guns. It’s last-days end-times evil that is metastasizing like the most aggressive form of stage 4 cancer under this president of God damn America. But mark this: evil always exploits evil in order to perpetuate still more evil.

You want to change America, Obama? How about if you have the moral wisdom to understand what John Adams told you:

“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

How about if you had the moral wisdom to understand what George Washington told you:

“Of all the habits and dispositions which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports.”

How about if you truly respect morality and religion and stop warring on them? That would be a change, too, you know. And unlike what you propose, it would actually fix the problem and like icing on a delicious cake, it would not mean creating a police state to crush the people’s constitutional guarantees.

Liberals have given us a Holocaust nine times larger than Hitler’s with more than 55 million innocent human beings murdered since Roe v. Wade in 1973. Obama said on December 14:

“The majority of those who died today were children — beautiful, little kids between the ages of 5 and 10 years old. They had their entire lives ahead of them — birthdays, graduations, weddings, kids of their own.”

Let me ask you, liberal: how in the hell did the 55 million babies you murdered NOT have their entire lives ahead of them before you snuffed them out as if human life meant nothing at all?

And you have the moral idiocy to wonder how in the world a culture that has brutally murdered one-sixth of its entire population could produce someone who wouldn’t value the lives of children???

Liberals and Democrats and socialists have purged the Ten Commandments from our culture. Their demonic judges have ruled that we cannot tolerate the Ten Commandments in public schools because:

“If the posted copies of the Ten Commandments are to have any effect at all, it will be to induce the schoolchildren to read, meditate upon, perhaps to venerate and obey, the Commandments”

We can only speculate what would have happened had liberals allowed the Ten Commandments to be posted so that gunman Adam Lanza could have had a chance to “venerate and obey the Ten Commandments.” It is frankly beyond amazing that liberals would rather have the “terrible times” of murderous children than allow America’s kids to reflect on the sacred dignity of human life represented in the Commandment, “Thou shalt not murder.”

Democrats have perverted and poisoned culture to the point that the soul of America is as dead as the 55 million babies they’ve butchered. They have redefined marriage and redefined the family. They have pumped atheism and random-change evolution into the minds of children while dredging any scintilla of the knowledge of God out of those same minds.

I’ve written about this before. But this is different. When I wrote about it before, Obama was merely posturing; now he has his second term and can ignore the Constitution and impose whatever tyranny he wants without fear of having to face a reelection – that according to his most ardent supporters. Even as other of his most ardent supporters are publicly calling for Obama to act like the fascist third-world dictator he is and jail the GOP and everyone who disagrees with his “fundamental transformation” of America.

In this shooting in a public school, the government just proved that it can’t even protect people in its very own buildings in its very own system even in a state that has the toughest gun control laws in the entire nation like Connecticut. And the obvious question is, “If they can’t protect your child in a government school, how are you supposed to protect them in your homes without guns when the police are few and far away? Do you think your harsh language or your Kung fu is that good, do you? And yet Democrats are now saying, “Disarm yourselves so you have no possible chance to protect yourselves. Let Obama protect you. And if Obama doesn’t protect you, you and your children should die.”

If home invasion terrorists break down the door of my house, I have something that Obama absolutely visceral despises: I have the means to protect my family and my property. Obama despises that because he wants me powerless, helpless, dependent and weak so that I have to turn to him and to his tyrant State.

Bill O’Reilly put it simply in one of his programs recently: “If somebody is trying to kill me, I want to have the ability to defend myself.” Liberals don’t want you to have that freedom or that ability. Just as Stalin didn’t want Russians to have it; Hitler didn’t want Germans to have it; Mao didn’t want Chinese to have it; Pol Pot didn’t want Cambodians to have it, and the dictators of North Korea don’t want their people to have it.

President Obama is surrounded by guns. If he really wants to take away guns, he should announce that he is starting with his own security rather than remove that security from millions of Americans. I’m guessing that won’t be his big announcement notifying us about how he’s going to change America. That’s because he knows that taking away his own security would be foolish; but he’s no more foolish than the cunning mass-murdering dictator Stalin to take away the security from everyone else.

What is happening all around us right now in this nation? We are letting out dangerous criminals out of prisons by the truckload because our government and our very system are breaking down. Obama has so massively loaded up the welfare system with debt that he now has to let out hundreds of thousands of criminal predators across the nation. The logic is: “Don’t worry; Obama will save you from all the violent convicts he just freed from the jails.” The American people are in a war, only in this war instead of being allowed to fight to defend ourselves and our families Obama is calling upon us to disarm and surrender to the violence that his political philosophy has bequeathed America these last fifty years.

A haunting passage in the Book of Revelation depicts this not-faraway state of affairs:

“Anyone who is destined for prison will be taken to prison. Anyone destined to die by the sword will die by the sword. This means that God’s holy people must endure persecution patiently and remain faithful.”–Revelation 13:10

When the Antichrist comes, there will be no power left on earth that can stop him. And the reason there will be no power on earth that can stop him will be because liberals will have already taken any power capable of stopping him out of the hands of the people before he comes.

But mark this: There will be terrible times in the God damn America of the last days. And the same slanderous enemies of God who gave us those terrible times will exploit them to set themselves up for the real horrors that are to come.

The beast is coming, and no, you won’t have any way to protect yourself or your family from the raw tyrant power of his government.

The very things that we’re doing right now is why the beast is coming.

Which is why in other news Iran has under the Obama administration developed the capability to manufacture 24 plutonium bombs – so far. After the same principles that now compose the Obama administration openly mocked the possibility of Iran developing nuclear weapons when George Bush was president and tried to warn America. And Armageddon, here we come.

I don’t want to end this on an angry note. So I’ll say this: after Obama’s reelection, I strongly considered buying a so-called “assault weapon” before Obama and the Democrats take my rights away. But I have decided not to. That’s my right as an American: to decide whether I and my family need more security or not. In our case, we have placed our trust in Jesus Christ and believe that He is coming to take us with Him in the Rapture. Were it not for that faith, I’d be getting ready for the Antichrist to come and I would believe I needed that assault weapon so when his government came to my door to drag me away, I could at least resist my own execution. And my question to you is this: what’s YOUR plan to be ready?


One blogger likes this.

December 17, 2012 Leave a reply

Andrew Sholly
Regional Field Support
Prudential Fox & Roach/The Trident Group
Andrew.Sholly@prufoxroach.com “Professionals helping people achieve the dream of homeownership.”


Microsoft Japan “Convinces” TV Station To Remove Segments Covering Gates’ Population Control Activities | ExplosiveReports.Com


Microsoft Japan “Convinces” TV Station To Remove Segments Covering Gates’ Population Control Activities Gallery


Jurriaan Maessen
December 17, 2012

Bill Gates Panicking As He Tightens The Screws On Free Press

According to the second largest newspaper in Japan, Microsoft mogul Bill Gates “expressed annoyance over a Japanese TV program that spread rumors he was “conspiring to control the world population” through his efforts to promote vaccinations.”

Apparently, Gates’ annoyance in regards to these the matter carries far. After a 12-minute segment was aired in which Gates’ vaccination campaigns were presented as the population control efforts they are, TV Tokyo Corporation was compelled to assure Microsoft Japan that it would “remove the questionable parts from rebroadcasts and DVD releases, Microsoft Japan officials said.” The Japanese paper reported:

“Microsoft Japan Co. asked TV Tokyo Corp. for a meeting to explain the thinking behind the Nov. 2 installment of “Yarisugi Toshi Densetsu Special 2012 Aki,” saying the company was deeply shocked by the misleading content.”

The article continues:

“On the Nov. 2 show, the emcee entertainer spent about 12 minutes floating such theories as “Bill Gates has devised a ghastly program on humanity” and “Rumors say he is attempting to use vaccines to control the world population.””

Bill Gates also told The Asahi Shimbun that “dispelling such misinformation about vaccinations would help to save the lives of millions of children. He said he wants TV viewers to understand the real situation.”

A TV Tokyo representative admitted that after talking to Microsoft Japan, the TV station: “We will draw on the latest feedback for our future work.”, after which it removed the segments deemed as “questionable” from rebroadcasts and DVD releases.

The question as to why Gates, through Microsoft Japan, was so passionate to make the Japanese TV station remove stories on possible nefarious purposes behind vaccination campaigns worldwide, is answered by the many bloggers posting messages calling on people to refuse vaccinations against uterine cervical cancer on the “erroneous grounds that the shots would cause sterility.”, the Japanese newspaper reports.

Not too long ago, Bill’s wife also attempted to convince people that everything is fine- and that all skepticism in regards to her and her husband’s Foundation is life-threatening. During a speech she gave at the TEDx Change in Berlin on April 6 of this year, Gates characterised all criticism of the Foundation’s adventures in the third world as dangerous, especially the charge that the foundation is actively but covertly involved in population control. Gates described the charge as so dangerous in fact, that the criticism“has led to much suffering and death.”

“Some people worry that the real goal is to control populations.”, Gates stated. “All these side issues have attached themselves to the core idea that men and women should be able to decide when to have a child. As a result, birth control has almost disappeared from the global health agenda.”, the audience was told.

“The greatest victims”, Gates continued, “have been in sub-Saharan Africa and the poorest parts of South Asia which contraceptives are frequently unavailable.”

Gates also said that “some people think contraceptives are code for abortion, which they’re not. Some people are uncomfortable because contraceptives have to do with sex.”

Speaking of “code” at a 2006 gathering of top globalists devoted to the “family planning agenda” under the umbrella-name “Demographic Dynamics and Socio-Economic Development”, professor of Medical Demography at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, John Cleland, admitted to the fact that they should cease using coded language when communicating to the general public. The gathering was attended by the usual suspects. Representatives were present of the United Nations Population Fund, the International Planned Parenthood Foundation, the European Commission, the World Bank and, last but not least, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

“No more shrouding our statements in code.”, the professor said. “Because code just confuses people.”, the professor said (page 33 in the document).

Cleland went on to say: “It does this cause no service at all to continue to shroud family planning in the obfuscating phrase “sexual and reproductive health”. People don’t really know what it means. If we mean family planning or contraception, we must say it. If we are worried about population growth, we must say it. We must use proper, straightforward language. I am fed up with the political correctness that daren’t say the name population stabilization, hardly dares to mention family planning or contraception out of fear that somebody is going to get offended. It is pathetic!”

To people who cannot believe dear Bill and Melinda would ever engage in deceiving an audience, let alone force information down the memory hole, I always recommend reading Henry Kissinger’s 1974 National Security Study Memorandum 200 in which the fiend wrote:

“(…) economic and social progress resulting from population control will (…) contribute to the decline in fertility rates” and “we cannot wait for overall modernization and development to produce lower fertility rates (…)”.

Like this:
Like Be the first to like this.
December 17, 2012 Leave a Reply

Andrew Sholly
Regional Field Support
Prudential Fox & Roach/The Trident Group
Andrew.Sholly@prufoxroach.com “Professionals helping people achieve the dream of homeownership.”


Three armed women teachers shot Adam Lanza in a classroom


Three armed women teachers shot Adam Lanza in a classroom

Three women teachers with guns shot Adam Lanza in a classroom

by Jon Rappoport

December 17, 2012


When everybody is diagnosed with a mental disorder, gun permits will be a thing of the past

Take that seriously.

At a presidential debate, Obama was asked about achieving gun control. He said, “Enforce the laws we’ve already got. Make sure we are keeping the guns out of the hands of criminals…[and] those who are mentally ill.”


In case you’ve been sleeping in a cave for the past few years, the US government is doing everything it can to create more categories of crimes, and the psychiatrists are expanding the list of (fictional but enforceable) mental disorders, as they also relentlessly promote “more diagnosis and treatment.”

Some estimates state 20-25% of the US population is suffering from a mental disorder. These are absurd and cooked figures, for several reasons, but it doesn’t matter. What matters is that huge numbers of people can be arbitrarily labeled as such.

So legally owning or not owning a gun may soon hinge on a broader definition of “mentally ill,” changed to “having been diagnosed with a mental disorder,” because that is one back-door way to execute a massive gun ban.

Simply put: diagnose everybody and his brother with a mental disorder, and then assert that any such diagnosis bars a person from obtaining a gun permit.

Psychiatry, in addition to destroying lives through toxic drugs, becomes a political instrument for gun control.

In the July editions of both Psychology Today and The Psychiatric Times, the same editorial, written by Dr. Allen Frances, America’s most influential psychiatrist, spelled out a clear position:

“Guns do kill people and the number of people depends on the number of guns and the number of rounds they can fire in a given period of time.”

Of course, no mention is made of the psychiatric drugs that induce violence and murder.

Dr. Frances sums up his unequivocal position: “We really have only two choices…accept mass murder as part of the American way of life, or…get in line with rest of the civilized world and adopt sane gun control policies.”

I thought I would explore the issue of mental illness from a slightly different perspective, however: WHY ARE FANATICAL GUN GRABBERS PSYCHOTIC?

What is the nature of THEIR mental disorder?

In the wake of the Newtown massacre, the gun-control forces are on the march. Ban this, ban that, go after the Doomsday preppers and bitter clingers.

The gun grabbers don’t respond to the obvious charge that, when honest people have weapons for self-defense, they can, in fact, defend themselves and stave off crime, harm, and death.

This point doesn’t make a dent.

Neither does arguing Second Amendment. Neither does painting a picture of a society in which the only people who have guns are the government and criminals. The gun grabbers seem to like that picture. At least theoretically.

Here are a few truths you can take to the bank:

If the media in this country (which are notoriously anti-gun) made a big deal out of every case in which an armed citizen successfully defended his home against a violent intruder, and made every such person a hero, we would have a different mood in America. Everybody would see the sense in gun ownership.

In the case of the Newtown killings, the media would be saying, “Now here is a tragic case in which no one in the school was carrying a weapon.” And everybody would see the sense and the truth of that.

So really, it’s matter of what the media cover and how they cover it, and what they ignore. That’s all it is. It isn’t anything else. In other words, they’re running a psyop.

Point two: the government doesn’t want private citizens to own and carry guns because that would diminish the role of government.

The people in charge hate it when private citizens take over a self-appointed government function. It’s insulting. It’s people saying to the government, “We don’t need you.” It’s proof that government acts in many, many ways that are intrusive and preemptive.

“No need to worry, officer, I caught the thief as he was leaving the liquor store. I pulled my weapon and put him down on the ground and cuffed him. He’s in the back of my car.”

No, no, no. no. The government must be in charge of everything that pertains to showing or using a gun. No outsiders allowed.

“Yes, Mrs. Smith, I’m sorry we’re late, and I’m sorry you husband was beaten to a pulp by that intruder, but we have other crimes to process. We have to man speed-traps. It’s better that your husband didn’t have a gun, let me assure you. Why? It just is. Now, let me call an ambulance. I hope they get him to the hospital in time.”

Imagine what the response would be if you asked an IRS executive what he thought about a flat consumer tax on bought goods that would replace the whole IRS code.

We’re talking about government jobs here. Jobs and money and pensions.

Private citizens must not do what the government does.

In case you hadn’t noticed, this spills over into the health field. The FDA certifies, as safe and effective, every (poisonous) medical drug before it can be prescribed for public use.

The FDA therefore controls drug treatment.

If somebody comes along and cooks up, in his kitchen, an herbal brew that knocks out the flu like a ridiculous little sissy in two hours, that’s a threat. Suddenly, a private citizen is miles ahead of the FDA (and the drug companies). No, no, no.

If home schoolers educate their kids better than government-run schools do, that’s another sore point. That’s bad. It expose the government factories that manufacture illiterate children.

Third point: if enough citizens were well-armed, it would take a full-scale federal invasion to overcome them in case of, oh, secession from the federalized United States.

The feds, of course, would win in the long run, if they killed enough people, but the publicity would be devastating to the government. Think Waco multiplied by a thousand or a million.

And in the process, word would get out about these well-armed private citizens’ grievances against the central government. The grievances would make sense to a lot of people watching the carnage unfold. Can’t have that. No, no, no.

Fourth point: A lot of people in this country grow up thinking they have to take care of other people. That’s really all they know how to do. This goes far beyond any understandable humane impulse.

This is meddling. It’s moving in on other people’s private business. The meddlers turn out to be vicious little scum. Well, where else are they going to be able to exercise these cheap impulses, other than in government jobs?

The corollary to this is: “I’m the hero. I protect you. I…you what? You protected yourself? No, you’re not allowed to do that, because then I can’t be a hero. You’re supposed to be the helpless citizen on my watch. If I can leap tall buildings, you have to be grounded. Otherwise, my life is in vain.”

Fifth point: Elites want to continue to own America. They want to have sway over the land and resources and people and money. Their minions and agents are the official people with weapons. That’s the way it works. It has to be a one-sided game. If millions and millions and millions of private citizens owned guns and knew how to use them, the tin gods wouldn’t be able to sleep well at night.

Sixth point: So-called liberals hate people who own guns. For them, guns are symbols of everything else they hate. Religion, land ownership, property rights, fences, and boundaries. Unless, of course, those fences define the liberals’ land.

Corollary: Many conservatives hate people who own guns, too, when they perceive those people are ready to decentralize power away from an overarching corporate-government control- nexus.

These are all elements of a true psychosis. It needs to be treated.

Short of mandatory sedatives, or a sudden attack on a lonely street at night by armed thugs, I recommend mandatory gun ownership for every non-felon adult in the US. This would solve the problem expeditiously.

I especially want to see all members of Congress packing heat in their chambers. If, once in a while, there is a shooting, well, we can catch it on C-Span. It won’t be lost to history.

I also want to see Chris Matthews in his MSNBC studio with a .45 strapped to his leg, the one that tingles.

There is one caveat to my proposal. In order to create a fully armed population, that population must be responsible, which is to say they must understand inviolable private property rights. They don’t have to own property, but they have to know that such a thing as private property exists. Why? Because property is one of the things an armed citizen has a right to defend.

Unfortunately, we’re losing the concept of private property like water leaking out of battered rowboat. It’s part of government’s plan, because government wants to own everything that isn’t already nailed down by its partner mega-corporations.

And government’s thinking goes this way: “Since we own everything, our cops defend it with guns; there is no reason for private armed citizens to defend it; it isn’t theirs.”

Meanwhile, I have to get going. I just got a message that three armed women teachers shot a guy named Adam Lanza in a classroom. I’m heading over to check it out.

Jon Rappoport

The author of an explosive collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at http://www.nomorefakenews.com

Andrew Sholly
Regional Field Support
Prudential Fox & Roach/The Trident Group
Andrew.Sholly@prufoxroach.com “Professionals helping people achieve the dream of homeownership.”


Two movies, two mass murders


Two movies, two mass murders

Two movies, two mass murders

By Jon Rappoport

December 16, 2012


The Dark Knight Rises and The Hunger Games.

We’ll get to them in a minute.

This article is in the interest of full disclosure. The easy way out is to accept the basic facts given to us by the police and media. So let’s take a breath, back up, and take a wider view.

Multiple media sources state Adam Lanza, the accused Newtown mass murderer, wore a mask while he killed 26 people in the Sandy Hook Elementary School. So who IDed him as the killer?

Obviously, the police, after the fact, when Lanza was dead.

In any crime with such torrid political implications (“take away the guns”), we have to question all the facts.

Presumably, the police found Lanza dead with a bullet wound from a gun lying next to him. They saw he was wearing a mask and body armor. They assumed he was the killer.

Later, the gun was traced back to its owner, Lanza’s mother. Bullet analysis of the victims revealed this was the murder weapon.

So it was a murder-suicide.

Unless there was a different person who did the shooting (cops found and arrested a man wearing camo in the woods near the school…what happened to him?). And who was the man police had “proned out” near the school?

An alternate scenario: Lanza was the patsy. The actual shooter(s) in the school killed him with the murder weapon.

Oh, well, that’s impossible.

Really? Why?

Because “everybody knows” Lanza did it?

Because the media report what the police tell them?

Because the police drew the “obvious” conclusion when they found a masked and body-armored Lanza dead with the murder weapon next to him?

It all comes down to this. Conventional reality vs. extraordinary reality. The overwhelming majority opt for the former every time.

Lee Oswald was the lone shooter (the majority don’t even believe this now). Sirhan Sirhan killed RFK (the evidence says he couldn’t, because he standing on the wrong side of RFK).

Lanza would be the perfect patsy. Loner, shy, vulnerable, behaved strangely, Asperger’s Syndrome; MOTHER WAS AN AVID GUN COLLECTOR, had taught her son to shoot; relative of the family tells CBS News the mother was worried about collapse of the economy, wanted weapons in case she had to defend her home and family (DOOMSDAY PREPPER)…and there you have just the right scenario for the gun grabbers, who have been going at it full-bore in the last two days.

“These kids would be still be alive if the mother wasn’t a doomsday prepper.”

On top of that, as I wrote in my previous article, we now have the boggling connection to The Hunger Games. In that sci-fi novel and film, 24 children are picked to take part in a competitive, national, blood-sacrifice, killing ritual…one child survives at the end and 23 die.

Twenty died in Newtown.

And the author of The Hunger Games, Suzanne Collins, lives in Sandy Hook, next to Newtown.

And this means? This is just the kind of bizarre and insane op secret societies are reputed to enjoy. Ordinarily, I would ignore this sort of thing and just call it a coincidence, but it’s too improbable. I can’t prove the killings in Newtown were part of that kind of op. But I can’t disregard it, either. The “coincidence” is just too stunning.

And if The Hunger Game connection is real here, then all bets are off.

If you recall, there was another recent mass murder in which a film played a part. Batman. The Dark Knight Rises. The Aurora theater. The Joker. James Holmes, also masked.

There are serious questions about exactly where he was arrested. At the theater exit, as the media reported? Or as other witnesses say, in his car. Was Holmes a patsy, set up to take the fall for murders committed by pros?

Corbin Dates, a purported eyewitness in the theater, and at least one other unnamed witness, spoke on camera to the media about a second shooter in the theater.

Yes, we want answers. We want them quickly. We always do. But it’s better to open up all lines of questioning, rather than chase a cooked-up scenario down the rabbit hole and end nowhere.

Of course, in the Newtown murders, we have all sorts of contradictory reports that surfaced early on. These “errors” have been attributed to “typical confusion that always accompanies” the first stories from a scene of chaos. We always write off these mistakes. But why should we?

There was the confusion about weapons. The killer used a hand gun. No he didn’t. It was a rifle. There was a rifle found in the trunk of a car. No, three weapons were found. The killing weapon was Sig Sauer pistol. No, a rifle, It was a Bushmaster rifle. No, it was a Sig Sauer rifle.

Were all these early errors made in the heat of a chaotic scene, or were some “errors” put out there to confuse a true investigation and possibly delay media and police, while the real killers escaped?

Inferring from the medical examiner’s statements, Lanza, if he was the killer and if he was using a Sig Sauer rifle, would have employed at least three clips in the killing spree. He would have had the persistence to reload that many times and continue the shooting?

A violent outburst, to which Lanza might have been prone, if he indeed had a developmental disorder called “Asperger’s.” is not the same thing as the methodical murder of 27 people, reloading three or more clips in his rifle.

And now let’s back up again, to the scene of the crime, as police were inside the school. From reports, the police entered the school after the carnage was over.

They found Lanza’s body. They saw the mask and body armor. They inferred he was the shooter. But what would have prevented the real pros, the killers, from killing Lanza and dressing him in a mask and body armor and leaving him there?

Oh, that couldn’t happened. People wouldn’t do that.

Really? Why not?

The two movies, The Hunger Games and The Dark Knight Rises, provided a backdrop of dystopian chaos and violence, and a society in which coherence has broken down. Criminal forces, winning. The vision of a peaceful and prosperous nation in which institutional justice stands a chance, shattered.

Whether you call “them” the Globalists, the secret societies, the Illuminati, the elites, the Bilderbergs, the CFR, the Trilateralists, you come up with the same game plan:

Destroy America, destroy the idea of individual freedom, destabilize the webs of community, engender fear, make it seem necessary for top-down control to be exerted, “to save us all” from rampant chaos.

These two movies, with tremendous advance publicity and anticipation, bolster the premise that American is too far gone to save.

Now, on top of that, we have two horrendous mass murders connected to these films, and the murders seem to prove the point: we are, in fact, too far gone…unless our wiser leaders step in and make great changes in the way we live.

What changes? Take all the guns. Restrict freedom. Spy on all of us 24/7, no matter where we are, no matter what we are doing.

Then and only then can we have peace. Then and only then can we live side by side in a Matrix of happiness.

“If you’re not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to fear.”

Yes. Be good little boys and girls. Obey all the rules. Accept new rules, whenever they are dictated. Keep your eyes straight ahead. Think good thoughts. Be positive.

But even then, be warned, as in Newtown, the perfect little American community, we can experience the murder of innocence. That’s the lesson that is being imparted.

Even then, we learn, there will be a struggle to establish this happy Matrix we all desire. Therefore, all the more reason to surrender our rights and freedoms, so our leaders can work their overarching solutions without resistance and interruption.

From chaos, order.

Jon Rappoport

The author of an explosive collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at http://www.nomorefakenews.com

Andrew Sholly
Regional Field Support
Prudential Fox & Roach/The Trident Group
Andrew.Sholly@prufoxroach.com “Professionals helping people achieve the dream of homeownership.”